[Efficacy of Posaconazole for Primary Prophylaxis in the Induction Therapy of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia]

Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Dec;29(6):1710-1713. doi: 10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2021.06.003.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To explore the effect of posaconazole in the primary prevention of invasive fungal disease (IFD) in the induction therapy of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

Methods: From August 2018 to November 2020, 144 pediatric patients with ALL treated in Department of Pediatrics, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University were selected, 88 cases received fluconazole as IFD prophylaxis (fluconazole prophylaxis group), 56 cases received posaconazole as IFD prophylaxis (posaconazole prophylaxis group). The incidence of IFD and treatment-related adverse reactions between the two groups were compared, and the safety of posaconazole was evaluated.

Results: The incidence of IFD in the fluconazole prophylaxis group was 20.4% (18/88), and in the posaconazole prophylaxis group was 7.1% (4/56). The incidence of IFD between the two groups was statistically significant different(P=0.030). There was no serious adverse reactions in the two groups. The incidence of mild adverse reactions in the posaconazole prophylaxis group (23.2%) was lower than that in the fluconazole prophylaxis group(39.8%), and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.039). There were 12 cases died in the fluconazole prophylaxis group and 4 in the posaconazole prophylaxis group, while no significant difference in the overall survival rate between the two groups (P=0.281).

Conclusion: The effect of posaconazole in the primary prophylaxis of IFD is better and incidence of adverse reactions is lower than fluconazole. Posaconazole can be tolerated, and expected to become the first-line primary prophylaxis drug for IFD during the induction remission therapy of childhood ALL.

题目: 泊沙康唑初级预防在儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病诱导治疗中的作用.

目的: 探讨泊沙康唑在儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病诱导治疗中初级预防侵袭性真菌病(IFD)的效果.

方法: 选择2018年8月-2020年11月中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院儿科血液专科急性淋巴细胞白血病患儿144例,88例采用氟康唑预防IFD(氟康唑预防组),56例采用泊沙康唑预防IFD(泊沙康唑预防组),比较两组IFD发生率及治疗相关不良反应的发生情况,评估泊沙康唑的安全性.

结果: 氟康唑预防组IFD发生率为20.4%(18/88),泊沙康唑预防组为7.1%(4/56),两组IFD发生率比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.030)。两组均未出现严重的不良反应,泊沙康唑组轻度不良反应发生率(23.2%)低于氟康唑组(39.8%),差异有统计学意义(P=0.039)。氟康唑预防组死亡12例,泊沙康唑预防组死亡4例,两组总体生存率比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.281).

结论: 泊沙康唑初级预防IFD的效果优于氟康唑,不良反应的发生率低于氟康唑且可以耐受,在儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病诱导缓解治疗中有望成为初级预防IFD一线药物.

MeSH terms

  • Antifungal Agents / therapeutic use
  • Child
  • Humans
  • Induction Chemotherapy
  • Mycoses* / drug therapy
  • Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma* / drug therapy
  • Primary Prevention
  • Triazoles

Substances

  • Antifungal Agents
  • Triazoles
  • posaconazole