Objectives: Preoperative anxiety is common and might affect surgical treatment outcomes. The aim was to translate and validate the Serbian version of the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS).
Methods: Following translation and initial evaluation, the Serbian version (S-APAIS) was administered to 385 patients. Internal consistency, construct validity, prognostic criteria validity, and concurrent validity between S-APAIS and Visual Analogue Scale for Anxiety (VAS-A) were evaluated.
Results: Factor analysis revealed two factors: APAIS-anesthesia (items 1, 2, 3) and APAIS-procedure (items 4, 5, 6). The whole scale, APAIS-anesthesia, and APAIS-procedure subscales showed an adequate level of internal consistency (Cronbach's αs: 0.787, 0.806, and 0.805, respectively). High concurrent validity was observed between APAIS-anesthesia and VAS-A (ρ = 0.628, p < .001). A moderate correlation was found between APAIS-procedure and VAS-A scale (ρ = 0.537, p < .001). At the cut-off point of 9, the area under the curve (AUC) of APAIS-anesthesia was 0.815 (95% CI: 0.77-0.85, p < .001). For the APAIS-procedure, AUC was 0.772 (95% CI: 0.73-0.81, p < .001) at the cut-off point of 8.
Conclusion: The structure of S-APAIS substantially differs from the original and allows separate measurement of anesthesia- and procedure-related anxieties. S-APAIS is a comprehensive, valid, and reliable instrument for the measurement of preoperative anxiety.
Keywords: Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale (APAIS); preoperative anxiety; reliability; validity; visual analogue scale for anxiety (VAS-A).
© 2021 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.