Pediatric Discharge From the Emergency Department Against Medical Advice

Pediatrics. 2022 Jan 1;149(1):e2021050996. doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-050996.

Abstract

In this Ethics Rounds we present a conflict regarding discharge planning for a febrile infant in the emergency department. The physician believes discharge would be unsafe and would constitute a discharge against medical advice. The child's mother believes her son has been through an already extensive and painful evaluation and would prefer to monitor her well-appearing son closely at home with a safety plan and a next-day outpatient visit. Commentators assess this case from the perspective of best interest, harm-benefit, conflict management, and nondiscriminatory care principles and prioritize a high-quality informed consent process. They characterize the formalization of discharge against medical advice as problematic. Pediatricians, a pediatric resident, ethicists, an attorney, and mediator provide a range of perspectives to inform ethically justifiable options and conflict resolution practices.

Publication types

  • Case Reports
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Decision Making, Shared
  • Emergency Service, Hospital / ethics*
  • Fever of Unknown Origin
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Male
  • Patient Discharge*
  • Refusal to Participate / ethics*
  • Treatment Refusal / ethics*
  • Urinalysis
  • Urinary Tract Infections / complications
  • Urinary Tract Infections / diagnosis