Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic approach to concurrent bariatric surgery and hiatal hernia repair: propensity score matching analysis using the 2015-2018 MBSAQIP

Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):6886-6895. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09027-x. Epub 2022 Jan 12.

Abstract

Background: Up to 37% of class three obesity patients have a Hiatal Hernia (HH). Most of the existent HHs get repaired at the time of bariatric surgery. Although the robotic platform might offer potential technical advantages over traditional laparoscopy, the clinical outcomes of the concurrent bariatric surgery and HH repair comparing robotic vs laparoscopic approaches have not been reported.

Methods: Using the 2015-2018 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database, patients between 18 and 65 year old who underwent Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) with concurrent HH repair were identified. Demographic, operative, and 30-day postoperative outcomes data were compared between laparoscopic and robotic groups. To adjust for potential confounders, 1:1 propensity score matching was performed using 22 preoperative characteristics.

Results: 75,034 patients underwent SG (n = 61,458) or RYGB (n = 13,576) with concurrent HH repair. The operative time was significantly longer in the Robotic-assisted compared to the laparoscopic approach both for SG (102.31 ± 44 vs. 75.27 ± 37; P < 0.001) and for RYGB (163.48 ± 65 vs. 132.87 ± 57; P < 0.001). In the SG cohort (4639 matched cases), the robotic approach showed similar results in 30 day outcomes as in the laparoscopic approach, with no statistical difference. Conversely, for the RYGB cohort (1502 matched cases), the robotic approach showed significantly fewer requirements for blood transfusions (0.3% vs. 1.7%; P = 0.001), fewer anastomotic leaks (0.2% vs. 0.8%; P = 0.035), and less postoperative bleeding (0.4% vs. 1.1%; P = 0.049).

Conclusion: Robotic concurrent bariatric surgery and HH repair leads to similar overall clinical outcomes as the laparoscopic approach despite longer operative times. Furthermore, the robotic approach is associated with reduced blood transfusion and anastomotic leak incidence in the RYGB group.

Keywords: Bariatric surgery; Hiatal hernia repair; Minimally invasive surgery; Robotic bariatric surgery; Robotic gastric bypass; Robotic sleeve gastrectomy.

MeSH terms

  • Accreditation
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Anastomotic Leak / surgery
  • Bariatric Surgery* / methods
  • Gastrectomy / adverse effects
  • Gastrectomy / methods
  • Gastric Bypass* / adverse effects
  • Gastric Bypass* / methods
  • Herniorrhaphy / methods
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy* / methods
  • Middle Aged
  • Obesity, Morbid* / complications
  • Obesity, Morbid* / surgery
  • Propensity Score
  • Quality Improvement
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Robotics*
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult