Surgical treatment of advanced anterior wall and apical vaginal prolapse using the anchorless self-retaining support implant: long-term follow-up

Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Nov;33(11):3067-3075. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-05045-w. Epub 2022 Jan 13.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Following health notification by the FDA in 2008 of serious complications with transvaginal mesh for anterior pelvic organ prolapse, there has been a return to native tissue repairs. Earlier work with a self-retaining support (SRS) implant showed a high anatomical success rate with minimal implant-related complications over a medium-term follow-up. It is proposed that post-implant complications are more a consequence of the method of mesh anchoring rather than the implant itself. Our system incorporates an ultralight mesh with a frame that provides level I, II, and III support without the need for fixation. The first long-term outcomes of SRS implantation are presented.

Methods: A prospective multicenter trial was conducted using two consecutive identical protocols of the use of the SRS implant in women with symptomatic anterior compartment prolapse extending their follow-up to 36 months. Anatomical success (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage 0 or 1 or a Ba ≤ -2) was recorded along with subjective success as defined by regular quality-of-life (PFDI-20 and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire) assessments.

Results: Sixty-seven patients completed 36 months of follow-up. Mean Ba measurements improved from 3.1 (-1 to 6) cm to -2.8 (-1 to -3) cm and C point from 0.4 (-8 to 6) cm to -6.9 (-10 cm to 1) cm. accumulating to a significant anatomical success rate of 94.3%. Subjective success based on question #3 of the PFDI-20, analyzed for the index surgical compartment, reached 95.7%. Post-operative complications included 2 cases of urinary retention, 1 minor frame exposure, 1 case of delayed voiding dysfunction, and 2 cases of de novo stress urinary incontinence. Untreated pre-operative second-degree Bp measurements had increased in 27% at follow-up.

Conclusion: The long-term outcome of the SRS implant shows an excellent subjective and objective success with minimal risk of complications or need for reintervention.

Keywords: Pelvic organ prolapse; Self-retaining support implant; Vaginal mesh.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / methods
  • Humans
  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse* / complications
  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse* / surgery
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology
  • Prospective Studies
  • Surgical Mesh / adverse effects
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Uterine Prolapse* / complications
  • Uterine Prolapse* / surgery