Characterization of Serum Samples With Discordant Results in 2 Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 IgG Assays

Background: Our laboratory system tests sera for herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) IgG using the DiaSorin Liaison chemiluminescent immunoassay (CIA), with the option to confirm positive samples by a laboratory-developed HerpeSelect inhibition assay. As part of the confirmation process, the HerpeSelect HSV-2 IgG enzyme immunoassay (EIA) is performed. This study investigated the relationship between DiaSorin HSV-2 IgG CIA-positive indices and HerpeSelect HSV-2 IgG EIA results.

Methods: HerpeSelect HSV-2 IgG EIA results were compiled for a cohort of consecutive DiaSorin HSV-2 IgG CIA-positive (index ≥1.10) samples. To further characterize DiaSorin CIA-positive samples that were positive (concordant) or negative (discordant) by the HerpeSelect EIA, a separate composite reference study panel was constructed and also tested using the Biokit HSV-2 IgG assay and an HSV-2 IgG inhibition assay developed for the DiaSorin instrument. Samples were classified as DiaSorin HSV-2 IgG true positive or false positive based on a composite reference using HerpeSelect EIA, Biokit, and DiaSorin inhibition results.

Results: Of 2305 consecutive DiaSorin HSV-2 IgG CIA-positive samples, 411 (17.8%) were HerpeSelect HSV-2 IgG EIA negative; 343 of 411 (83%) had DiaSorin indices of 1.10 to 3.00. For the composite reference study panel (N = 120), 59 of 60 discordant samples were classified as DiaSorin HSV-2 IgG false positive based on the composite reference, whereas 58 of 60 concordant samples were classified as true positive.

Conclusions: Nearly all DiaSorin HSV-2 IgG CIA-positive but HerpeSelect HSV-2 IgG EIA-negative sera are falsely positive in the DiaSorin CIA. Furthermore, most DiaSorin false-positive samples exhibit low-positive indices, suggesting that guidelines for confirmatory testing should include low-positive samples by CIA and EIA.