Background: In acute myocardial infarction (MI), the prognosis has been improved, and the length of hospital stay has been shortened. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the potential of identifying low-risk patients for early discharge after acute MI using the GRACE and CADILLAC risk scores.
Methods: This bi-center registry included 797 patients with acute MI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the tertiles and pre-defined thresholds of the GRACE and CADILLAC scores. The primary endpoint was a composite of in-hospital major adverse events (all-cause death, sustained ventricular arrhythmia, recurrent MI, heart failure requiring intravenous treatment, stroke, and major bleeding events).
Results: Of 797 patients, 271 (34.0%) and 316 (39.7%) had low GRACE and CADILLAC risk scores. During the hospitalization, 251 (31.5%) patients had major adverse events. Higher GRACE and CADILLAC scores were associated with longer length of stay and higher in-hospital adverse event rates. In patients with low GRACE and/or CADILLAC risk scores, 16 (5.9%) and 16 (5.1%) had in-hospital adverse events, most of which occurred within 3 days. Only 1 (0.4% and 0.3%) patient had major adverse events on day 4 or later in the low GRACE and CADILLAC risk score groups.
Conclusion: In patients with acute MI with low GRACE and/or CADILLAC risk scores who were free from acute events within 3 days, early discharge after primary percutaneous coronary intervention may be feasible and safe.
Keywords: Acute myocardial infarction; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Risk score.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.