Physician‒scientists have made countless discoveries, and their dwindling numbers are a significant concern. Although dermatology has become an increasingly popular destination for physician‒scientist trainees, the proportion of trainees who pursue scientific research careers after training is among the lowest of all medical specialties. To investigate this problem, we surveyed a national cohort of dermatology educators, physician‒scientist track program directors, and National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases T32 directors for opinions regarding physician‒scientist training in dermatology. On the basis of these findings and to help address the issue, we propose a training practicum and provide a resource for funding opportunities to help guide trainees and institutions interested in supporting investigative dermatologists. We also discuss the important roles of department chairs and institutions in fashioning an environment conducive to physician‒scientist training. The information and recommendations provided in this paper may help to improve the recruitment, training, development, and retention of investigative dermatologists and future leaders in this field.
Keywords: ABD, American Board of Dermatology; ASCI, American Society of Clinical Investigators; CDA, Career Development Award; CV, curriculum vitae; LRP, loan repayment program; MD, medical degree; MSTP, Medical Scientist Training Program; NIAMS, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases; NIGMS, National Institute of General Medical Sciences; NIH, National Institutes of Health; PGY, postgraduate year; PSTP, physician‒scientist training program; PSW, physician‒scientist workforce; STAR, Specialty Training and Advanced Research; URM, under-represented minority.
© 2021 The Authors.