[Clinical value of various classifications in adults with AML]

Onkologie. 1986 Apr;9(2):67-71. doi: 10.1159/000215966.
[Article in German]

Abstract

111 adults with acute myeloid leukemia were classified according to the morphological, immunological and cytogenetic features of their leukemic cells. A comparison was made between the clinical parameters on prognosis of these subgroups. Hemoglobin was the only parameter among all six FAB-subgroups to show a statistical significant difference. Other differences found applied to a few subgroups only. Again, immunologically or cytogenetically characterized subgroups did not show significant differences in clinical parameters or prognosis. Patients with pseudodiploid or hyperdiploid karyotype had a lower remission rate than the remainder. However, a cluster analysis in which all three classifications together with the clinical parameters were considered was best able to characterize groups with different prognosis.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal
  • Bone Marrow / immunology
  • Bone Marrow / pathology
  • Female
  • Fluorescent Antibody Technique
  • Hemoglobinometry
  • Humans
  • Karyotyping
  • Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute / classification*
  • Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute / immunology
  • Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute / pathology
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Monocytes / ultrastructure
  • Phenotype
  • Prognosis

Substances

  • Antibodies, Monoclonal