Systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of pembrolizumab versus other interventions for previously untreated, unresectable or metastatic, MSI-high or MMR-deficient CRC

Future Oncol. 2022 Jun;18(17):2155-2171. doi: 10.2217/fon-2021-1633. Epub 2022 Mar 25.

Abstract

Aim: To compare pembrolizumab with competing interventions for previously untreated, unresectable or metastatic microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer. Method: Trials were identified via a systematic literature review and synthesized using a Bayesian network meta-analysis with time-varying hazard ratios (HRs). Results: Using intention-to-treat data, HRs for overall survival were generally in favor of pembrolizumab but not statistically significant; however, statistical significance was reached versus all comparators by month 16 when accounting for crossover. Estimated HRs for progression-free survival significantly favored pembrolizumab versus all comparators by month 12. Pembrolizumab was also superior to all comparators in terms of grade ≥3 adverse events. Conclusion: These analyses suggest that pembrolizumab is a highly efficacious and safe treatment in this population.

Keywords: anti-PD-1 inhibitors; biomarkers; colorectal cancer; immuno-oncology therapy; microsatellite instability; network meta-analysis; systematic literature review.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
  • Bayes Theorem
  • Colorectal Neoplasms* / drug therapy
  • Colorectal Neoplasms* / genetics
  • DNA Mismatch Repair
  • Humans
  • Microsatellite Instability
  • Neoplasms*
  • Network Meta-Analysis

Substances

  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
  • pembrolizumab

Grants and funding