Endoscopic vacuum therapy for post-esophagectomy anastomotic dehiscence as rescue treatment: a single center case series

Esophagus. 2022 Jul;19(3):417-425. doi: 10.1007/s10388-022-00912-x. Epub 2022 Mar 28.

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) represents an effective endoscopic technique for the treatment of post-esophagectomy leaks and can be used after failure of primary treatment. We aimed to investigate endoscopic data and success rate of EVT for post-esophagectomy anastomotic leaks, after failed redo surgery or previous endoscopic treatment.

Methods: We retrospectively recruited 12 patients from January 2018 to October 2020. Success was defined as dehiscence closure at radiological and/or endoscopic evaluation. Ethical Committee of our institution approved the study.

Results: Twelve patients (66.7% male, mean age 65.08 ± 16.7 years) affected by esophago-gastric (n = 10) or esophago-jejunal (n = 2) anastomosis dehiscences after oncologic surgery were treated with EVT, after failure of previous redo-surgical (n = 3, 25%) or endoscopic management (n = 9, 75%). Technical success rate was 100% (60/60 procedures) and dehiscence closure was achieved in three quarters of patients (9/12, 75%). Regarding complications, one case of sponge dislocation (1/60 = 1.7%) and another case of delayed stricture after post-EVT stent placement (1/60 = 1.7%) were recorded, during a mean follow up of 182.3 days.

Conclusions: EVT is a promising option in the treatment of the most complicated anastomotic dehiscences. Its use could be also considered after failure of previous endoscopic or surgical management.

Keywords: Endoscopic vacuum therapy; Esophagectomy; Leak.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Anastomosis, Surgical / adverse effects
  • Anastomotic Leak / etiology
  • Anastomotic Leak / surgery
  • Esophagectomy* / adverse effects
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy* / adverse effects
  • Retrospective Studies