A Seat at the Table: The Correlation Between Female Authorship and Urology Journal Editorial Board Membership

Background: Gender disparities in editorial board composition exist across a variety of surgical subspecialties.

Objective: To investigate temporal variation in gender representation on the editorial boards of urology journals and assess the relationship between editorial board composition and female authorship.

Design, setting, and participants: We analyzed female authorship and editorial board composition between 2002 and 2020 among eight high-impact urology journals. Female publication status was assessed using publication records retrieved from PubMed. Editorial board information was manually extracted and titles were grouped for comparison as Editor-in-Chief, mid-level editor, and consulting editors.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Female representation across different editorial levels was analyzed via hierarchical logistic regression with additional terms to test for between-journal differences in overall representation and change over time. The relationship between representation on editorial boards and as publication authors was assessed at the journal level via correlation.

Results and limitations: Eight journals and 49 412 articles were analyzed. No female has held the title of Editor-in-Chief for any of these eight journals in 18 yr. Significant growth was seen for mid-level editors, whereas no growth was seen for consulting editors. Neurourology and Urodynamics and Journal of Sexual Medicine had significantly higher than average female editorial board representation (p < 0.05). Across the eight journals, there was a statistically significant correlation between the proportion of overall female authors and female editors (r = 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.65-0.99). For all journals, the proportion of female contributing authors is greater than the proportion of female editorial board members.

Conclusions: Women in urology represent a small but increasing presence as editorial board members. Clear differences exist between journals, potentially attributable to specialty-specific demographics. Despite increasing representation, no female has ever been appointed Editor-in-Chief for any of the eight journals evaluated. At the journal-specific level, a positive correlation was observed between female editorial staff and female authorship. Given the implication of both academic authorship and editorial board assignment on academic advancement, actionable changes are outlined to guide improvement in gender diversity at the journal level.

Patient summary: Females are under-represented on the editorial boards for urology journals, although some roles have seen growth over time. Moreover, female editorial board membership is associated with representation of females among article authors. Gender disparities in both are noteworthy because they affect career paths and contribute to the gender gap in urology.