Effect of a perinatal care quality improvement package on patient satisfaction: a secondary outcome analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial

BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 6;12(6):e054544. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054544.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of a quality improvement (QI) package on patient satisfaction of perinatal care.

Design: Secondary analysis of a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial. Participating hospitals were randomised by size into four different wedges.

Setting: 12 secondary-level public hospitals in Nepal.

Participants: Women who gave birth in the hospitals at a gestational age of ≥22 weeks, with fetal heart sound at admission. Adverse outcomes were excluded. One hospital was excluded due to data incompleteness and four low-volume hospitals due to large heterogeneity. The final analysis included 54 919 women.

Intervention: Hospital management was engaged and facilitators were recruited from within hospitals. Available perinatal care was assessed in each hospital, followed by a bottle-neck analysis workshop. A 3-day training in essential newborn care was carried out for health workers involved in perinatal care, and a set of QI tools were introduced to be used in everyday practice (skill-checks, self-assessment checklists, scoreboards and weekly Plan-Do-Study-Act meetings). Refresher training after 6 months.

Outcome measure: Women's satisfaction with care during childbirth (a prespecified secondary outcome).

Results: The likelihood of women being overall satisfied with care during childbirth increased after the intervention (adjusted OR (aOR): 1.66, 95% CI: 1.59 to 1.73). However, the proportions of overall satisfaction were low (control 58%, intervention 62%). Women were more likely to be satisfied with education and information from health workers after intervention (aOR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.29 to 1.40) and to have been treated with dignity and respect (aOR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.52 to 2.16). The likelihood of having experienced abuse during the hospital stay decreased (aOR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.51) and of being satisfied with the level of privacy increased (aOR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.18).

Conclusions: Improvements in patient satisfaction were indicated after the introduction of a QI-package on perinatal care. We recommend further studies on which aspects of care are most important to improve women's satisfaction of perinatal care in hospitals in Nepal.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN30829654.

Keywords: neonatology; paediatrics; quality in health care.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Child
  • Female
  • Health Personnel / education
  • Hospitals, Public
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Parturition
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Perinatal Care*
  • Pregnancy
  • Quality Improvement*

Associated data

  • ISRCTN/ISRCTN30829654