Pollinator identity and behavior affect pollination in kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis Planch.)

PeerJ. 2022 Jun 9:10:e12963. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12963. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Many crop plants rely on insect pollination, particularly insect-pollinated crops which are functionally dioecious. These crops require insects to move pollen between separate plants which are functionally male or female. While honey bees are typically considered the most important crop pollinator species, many other insects are known to visit crops but the pollination contribution of the full diversity of these flower visitors is poorly understood. In this study, we examine the role of diverse insect pollinators for two kiwifruit cultivars as model systems for dioecious crops: Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosa 'Hayward' (a green-fleshed variety) and A. chinensis var. chinensis 'Zesy002' (a gold-fleshed variety). In our round-the-clock insect surveys, we identified that psychodid flies and mosquitoes were the second and third most frequent floral visitors after honey bees (Apis mellifera L), but further work is required to investigate their pollination efficiency. Measures of single-visit pollen deposition identified that several insects, including the bees Leioproctus spp. and Bombus spp. and the flies Helophilus hochstetteri and Eristalis tenax, deposited a similar amount of pollen on flowers as honey bees (Apis mellifera). Due to their long foraging period and high pollen deposition, we recommend the development of strategies to boost populations of Bombus spp., Eristalis tenax and other hover flies, and unmanaged bees for use as synergistic pollinators alongside honey bees.

Keywords: Actinidia chinensis; Alternative pollinators; Kiwifruit; Pollination effectiveness; Pollination efficiency.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Actinidia*
  • Animals
  • Bees
  • Crops, Agricultural
  • Culicidae*
  • Flowers
  • Insecta
  • Pollination

Grants and funding

David E. Pattemore was awarded the Plant & Food Research Discovery Science grant DS 14-65 for examining time-of-day effects. David E. Pattemore and Bradley G. Howlett received funding for work on bumble bees and wild pollinators through the New Zealand Ministry for Business, Employment & Innovation (“MBIE”, www.mbie.govt.nz/) under grant no. C11X1309, “Bee minus to Bee plus and Beyond: Higher Yields from Smarter, Growth-focused Pollination Systems”. Zespri Group Ltd provided funding for projects led by LE (GP1700, as part of Ministry for Primary Industries (https://www.mpi.govt.nz/) Sustainable Farming Fund project no. 404958; and GP1723, efficiency of bumble bee pollination of ‘Zesy002’ as part of MBIE C11X1309) and David E. Pattemore (GP1976, pollination of ‘Zesy002’ by bumble bees as part of MBIE C11X1309). Zespri Group Ltd contracted PFR to conduct the research projects independently to address questions of importance to their business, and the other granting agencies had no role in the research process apart from approving the initial proposal and granting funding. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.