Case volume regionalization and volume-based outcome differences in cutaneous head and neck melanoma

Head Neck. 2022 Nov;44(11):2428-2436. doi: 10.1002/hed.27150. Epub 2022 Jul 29.

Abstract

Background: Hospital volume has emerged as a prognostic factor in oncology but is not currently known whether volume is associated with improved outcomes for cutaneous head and neck (HN) melanoma.

Methods: A total of 556 079 cutaneous melanoma cases reported by the 2004-2016 National Cancer Database were separated into two cohorts (HN and non-HN) and facilities within each cohort were classified by case volume. Analysis employed chi-square, analysis of variance, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: Only 41 facilities (3.1% of 1326) treating HN melanoma and 50 facilities (3.7% of 1344) treating non-HN melanoma were classified as high-volume facilities (HVFs). The estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) was 62.7% (standard error [SE]: 0.4%) for patients with HN at low-volume facilities (LVFs), 69.3% (SE: 0.4%) at IVFs, and 71.8% (SE 0.4%) at HVFs (p < 0.001). Differences in OS remained significant between HVFs versus LVFs after adjusting for confounders.

Conclusion: Volume is independently associated with OS and improved surgical outcomes for HN melanoma.

Keywords: cutaneous melanoma; facility volume; head and neck cancer; otolaryngology; regionalization; skin melanoma.

MeSH terms

  • Cohort Studies
  • Head and Neck Neoplasms* / therapy
  • Humans
  • Melanoma* / therapy
  • Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant
  • Prognosis
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Skin Neoplasms* / therapy