Virtual vascular surgery interest group during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic

Objectives: Early exposure to vascular surgery at the medical student level positively influences one's decision to apply into an integrated vascular surgery residency program. Vascular surgery interest groups (VSIGs) are student-run and aim to facilitate such exposure, traditionally via in-person events. Social distancing during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic disrupted these interactions. This is a description of the virtual activities of a VSIG group during the 2020-2021 academic year and highlights their impact among medical students.

Methods: The virtual activities of the VSIG at the Yale School of Medicine were reviewed. Students received surveys prior and after activities to assess their impact. Preactivity and postactivity surveys using Likert scale (1 = completely disagree; 5 = completely agree) were administered and compared. Statistical significance was achieved with a P value of less than .05.

Results: A total of five virtual events were held: an Introductory Session (October 2020), a Simulation Session (November 2020), a Research Night (January 2021), a Journal Club (February 2021), and a National Match Panel (April 2021). The surveys of three events (Introductory Session, Simulation Session, and National Match Panel) were analyzed. Attendance at these events were 18, 55, and 103 respectively. The average presurvey response rate was 51.2% and the average postsurvey response rate was 27.46%. Students agreed that the Introductory Session increased their knowledge about vascular surgery as a subspecialty (4.22 ± 0.67) and that the session was valuable to their time (4.33 ± 1.00). The Simulation Session increased student's comfort with knot tying from 1.73 ± 0.89 to 3.21 ± 1.25 (P < .001). Students reported an increased understanding of residency program selection (2.39 ± 1.10 vs 3.21 ± 1.12; P = .018), the Electronic Residency Application Service application (2.16 ± 1.01 vs 3.00 ± 0.88; P = .007), and letters of recommendation (2.45 ± 1.07 vs 3.14 ± 1.17; P = .04). Students particularly had a significant increase in the understanding of the logistics of residency interviews, which were held virtually that year for the first time (1.84 ± 0.96 vs 3.29 ± 1.20; P < .001).

Conclusions: Virtual VSIG activities were feasible and effective during the pandemic in promoting student engagement and interest in vascular surgery. Despite lifting social distancing measures, the virtual format could become a valuable tool to expand outreach efforts of the vascular surgery community to recruit talented medical students.