Enhancing Patient Literacy on Calcium Supplementation: A Quality Improvement Initiative

Objective: This study aims to assess patients' knowledge and identify barriers in interpreting calcium on supplement and nutrition labels and to determine whether education would be beneficial.

Methods: Patients with conditions requiring calcium supplementation were included in this study. Participants were first given a 9-question pre-education survey. They were then taught how to read calcium on labels using the educational cards developed. This was followed by a 7-question posteducation survey. Endocrinologists were surveyed to assess their experience in treating patients who required calcium supplementation.

Results: Before education, 31 (33%) and 37 (40%) of the participants felt that the supplement and nutrition labels, respectively, were confusing. After education, only 2 (2%) and 6 (6%) of the participants, respectively, still felt the same. There was a significant improvement in the interpretation of calcium citrate (Citracal) and calcium carbonate (TUMS) labels, with a trend of improvement in reading a milk label. Of the 47 endocrinologists surveyed, only 5 (11%) felt that their patients often or always knew the correct amount of calcium to be taken. Two-thirds 30 (64%) of the endocrinologists always or often explained to their patients how to interpret calcium labels. About half 23 (49%) of the endocrinologists always or often needed to take time to look up the calcium content of supplements. For most endocrinologists 29 (62%), this took at least 2 to 4 minutes.

Conclusion: Our patients had trouble interpreting calcium labels, and the use of educational cards was effective in improving calcium literacy.