Background: Artificial intelligence is currently being used to facilitate early disease detection, better understand disease progression, optimize medication/treatment dosages, and uncover promising novel treatments and potential outcomes.
Methods: Utilizing the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) dataset, we built a machine learning model to predict depression remission rates using same clinical data as features for each of the first three antidepressant treatment steps in STAR*D. We only used early treatment data (baseline and first follow up) in each STAR*D step to temporally analyze predictive features of remission at the end of the step.
Results: Our model showed significant prediction performance across the three treatment steps, At step 1, Model accuracy was 66 %; sensitivity-65 %, specificity-67 %, positive predictive value (PPV)-65.5 %, and negative predictive value (NPV)-66.6 %. At step 2, model accuracy was 71.3 %, sensitivity-74.3 %, specificity-69 %, PPV-64.5 %, and NPV-77.9 %. At step 3, accuracy reached 84.6 %; sensitivity-69 %, specificity-88.8 %, PPV-67 %, and NPV-91.1 %. Across all three steps, the early Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR) scores were key elements in predicting the final treatment outcome. The model also identified key sociodemographic factors that predicted treatment remission at different steps.
Limitations: The retrospective design, lack of replication in an independent dataset, and the use of "a complete case analysis" model in our analysis.
Conclusions: This proof-of-concept study showed that using early treatment data, multi-step temporal prediction of depressive symptom remission results in clinically useful accuracy rates. Whether these predictive models are generalizable deserves further study.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00021528.
Keywords: Decision trees; Depression; Machine learning; Predictive models; Remission.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.