Adhesives free bark panels: An alternative application for a waste material

PLoS One. 2023 Jan 23;18(1):e0280721. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280721. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

The proportion of bark in tree trunks is in the range of ~ 10-20%. This large amount of material is currently mainly considered as a by- or even waste-product by the timber processing industry. Recently, efforts towards the use of bark have been made, e.g. as a raw material to harvest different chemical compounds or as an additive for wood particle boards. Our motivation for this work was to keep the bark in an almost natural state and explore alternative processes and applications for use. The traditional method of de-barking tree trunks by peeling was used to harvest large bark pieces. Two pieces of peeled bark were placed crosswise, with the rhytidom side (outer bark) facing each other. After different conditioning steps, bark pieces were hot pressed to panels without adding adhesives. These experiments on bark samples of different Central European tree species suggest that production of panels with species dependent properties is possible and feasible. This is a step towards producing sustainable panels by using a natural waste material, while retaining its beneficial structure and its natural chemical composition.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adhesives* / chemistry
  • Plant Bark* / chemistry
  • Trees
  • Waste Products / analysis
  • Wood / chemistry

Substances

  • Adhesives
  • Waste Products

Grants and funding

CW, FR and ME acknowledge the support of the Cluster of Excellence “Matters of Activity. Image Space Material” funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy – EXC 2025-390648296 (https://www.dfg.de). The support of the Max Planck Society is acknowledged by CW, FR, NH and ME. FB was financed by the project “HoBeOpt” (Grant No.: 22008518), which is funded by the Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe e.V. (https://www.fnr.de/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.