Did you donate? Talking about donations predicts compliance with solicitations for donations

PLoS One. 2023 Feb 2;18(2):e0281214. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281214. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Many forms of prosocial behaviour are highly institutionalized. They are facilitated by organizations that broker between donors and recipients. A highly effective tool that organizations use to elicit prosocial behaviour are solicitations for donations (e.g., of blood, time, or money). Using register and survey data on blood donations in the Netherlands, we examine to what extent compliance with these solicitations is predicted by being recruited via word of mouth (WOM) and talking about donations. Our model predicts that donors that are one unit higher on our measure of talking about donations (range = 1-4) have a 2.9 percentage points higher compliance with solicitations for donations. In addition, this association is stronger for novice donors. Our study demonstrates the social embedding of the donors' decision-making processes about compliance. For practice, our results imply that organizations may increase their contributors' communication about donations to increase the effectiveness of their solicitations.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Blood Donation*
  • Blood Donors
  • Communication
  • Humans
  • Netherlands
  • Tissue Donors*

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [grant agreement No. 802227 to E.-M.M.] (funder website: https://erc.europa.eu/). Pamala Wiepking’s position at the Lilly Family School of Philanthropy is funded by the Stead Family (no website), her work at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam is funded by the Dutch Postcode Lotteries (funder website: https://www.novamedia.com/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.