Impact of galvanic vestibular stimulation electrode current density on brain current flow patterns: Does electrode size matter?

PLoS One. 2023 Feb 3;18(2):e0273883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273883. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Background: Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) uses at least one electrode placed on the mastoid process with one or multiple placed over other head areas to stimulate the vestibular system. The exact electrode size used is not given much importance in the literature and has not been reported in several studies. In a previous study, we compared the clinical effects of using different electrode sizes (3 cm2 and 35 cm2) with placebo but with the same injected current, on postural control. We observed significant improvement using the smaller size electrode but not with the bigger size electrode. The goal of this study was to simulate the current flow patterns with the intent to shed light and potentially explain the experimental outcome.

Methods: We used an ultra-high-resolution structural dataset and developed a model to simulate the application of different electrode sizes. We considered current flow in the brain and in the vestibular labyrinth.

Results: Our simulation results verified the focality increase using smaller electrodes that we postulated as the main reason for our clinical effect. The use of smaller size electrodes in combination with the montage employed also result in higher induced electric field (E-field) in the brain.

Conclusions: Electrode size and related current density is a critical parameter to characterize any GVS administration as the choice impacts the induced E-field. It is evident that the higher induced E-field likely contributed to the clinical outcome reported in our prior study.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Brain*
  • Electric Stimulation / methods
  • Electrodes
  • Postural Balance / physiology
  • Vestibular Nerve / physiology
  • Vestibule, Labyrinth* / physiology

Grants and funding

1) Initial who received award: AD 2) Grant number: W912CG21C0014 3) Full name of funder: Department of Defense 4) URL of funder: https://www.darpa.mil/ 5) The funders had no role in the study design,data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.