Cost-effectiveness of a purpose-built ward environment and new allied health model of care for major trauma

Background: Targeted rehabilitation within the acute inpatient setting could have a substantial impact on improving outcomes for major trauma patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of the introduction of a purpose-built ward environment, and a new allied health model of care (AHMOC) delivered in the acute inpatient setting, in a major trauma population.

Methods: The statewide trauma registry, the trauma center's data warehouse, and electronic medical record data were used for this observational study. There were three phases: baseline, new ward, and new AHMOC. Cost-effectiveness was measured as cost per quality-adjusted life year using preinjury, hospital discharge, 1-month and 6-month 5-level, EQ-5D utility scores. Total costs included initial acute and inpatient rehabilitation care, as well as outpatient, readmission and ED presentations to 6-months.

Results: Four hundred eleven patients were included. Case-mix was stable between phases. The median (IQR) number of allied health services received by patients was 8 (5-17) at baseline, 10 (5-19) in the new ward phase, and 17 (9-23) in the AHMOC phase. The proportion discharged to rehabilitation was 37% at baseline, 45% with the new ward and 28% with the new AHMOC. Mean (SD) total Australian dollar costs were $69,335 ($141,175) at baseline, $55,943 ($82,706) with the new ward and $37,833 ($49,004) with the AHMOC. The probability of the AHMOC being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 per quality-adjusted life year was 99.4% compared with baseline and 98% compared with the new ward.

Conclusion: The new allied health model of care was found to be a cost-effective intervention. Uptake of this model of allied health care at other trauma centers has the potential to reduce the cost and burden of major trauma.

Level of evidence: Economic and Value-based Evaluations; Level III.