Social Security spends $135 million yearly, contracting with physicians to provide consultative examinations for disability applicants. However, little is known about who these physicians are or how they view the determination of impairment. We surveyed a random sample of 153 physicians from North Carolina who performed consultative examinations for the North Carolina Disability Determinations Agency in 1983 (the consultative group), and a randomly selected group of 165 physicians of similar medical specialties (the comparison group). Response rates were 75% for the consultative group and 66% for the comparison group. Most consultative physicians (63%) performed fewer than 6 examinations per month. Characteristics of the consultative physicians were similar to the comparison group. Both groups were skeptical of the claims of disability applicants; 48% of the consultative and 55% of the comparison group thought that a majority of applicants could be employed. Of the consultative physicians, 53% indicated that they had learned little about disability programs from any source. Most consultative physicians (58%) judged it "almost impossible" to determine impairment on the basis of a single office examination. However, consultative physicians were less likely than the comparison group to view Social Security as difficult to work with (25% vs. 54%; P less than 0.01). Agencies that determine disability ask physicians to perform a task for which they feel ill prepared and have little special knowledge.