Injuries incurred from minimally invasive access for abdominal surgery

Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5368-5373. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10031-y. Epub 2023 Mar 30.

Abstract

Background: Injuries during initial port placement in minimally invasive abdominal surgery are rare but can cause major morbidity. We aimed to characterize the incidence, consequence, and risk factors for injury occurring on initial port placement.

Methods: This is a retrospective review of a General Surgery quality collaborative database with supplementary input from the Morbidity and Mortality conference database at our institution between 6/25/2018 and 6/30/2022. Patient characteristics, operative details, and postoperative course were assessed. Cases with an injury on entry were compared to cases without an injury to identify risk factors for injury.

Results: 8844 minimally invasive cases were present between the two databases. Thirty-four injuries (0.38%) occurred during initial port placement. Seventy-one percent of injuries were bowel injuries (full or partial thickness) and the majority (79%) of injuries were recognized during the index operation. Median surgeon experience for the cases with an injury was 9 years (IQR 4.25-14.5) compared to 12 years of experience for all surgeons contributing to the database (p = 0.004). Previous laparotomy was also significantly correlated with the rate of injury on entry (p = 0.012). There was no significant difference in the rate of injury based on method of entry (cut-down: 19 (55.9%), optical entry without Veress: 10 (29.4%), Veress followed by optical entry: 5 (14.7%), p = 0.11). BMI > 30 kg/m2 (injury: 16/34 vs no injury: 2538/8844, p = 0.847) was not associated with an injury. Fifty-six percent (19/34) of patients with an injury on initial port placement required laparotomy at some point in their hospital course.

Conclusions: Injuries are rare during initial port placement for minimally invasive abdominal surgery. In our database, history of a previous laparotomy was a significant risk factor for an injury and appears to be more consequential than commonly implicated factors such as technique, patient body habitus, or surgeon experience.

Keywords: Cut-down; Injury; Minimally invasive; Optical port with Veress; Optical without Veress; Trocar.

MeSH terms

  • Abdomen / surgery
  • Abdominal Injuries* / epidemiology
  • Abdominal Injuries* / etiology
  • Abdominal Injuries* / surgery
  • Abdominal Muscles / surgery
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy* / methods
  • Laparotomy / adverse effects