Long-term efficacy of metal versus plastic stents in inoperable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma; a multicenter retrospective propensity score matched comparison

HPB (Oxford). 2023 Jul;25(7):798-806. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.03.011. Epub 2023 Mar 23.

Abstract

Background: For palliative drainage of inoperable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) uncovered metal stents are preferred over plastic stents. However, there is a lack of data on re-interventions at the long-term. The aim is to evaluate the potential difference in the number of re-interventions in patients surviving at least 6 months.

Methods: Retrospective study including patients with pCCA who underwent plastic stent placement(s) or had metal stent(s) in situ for at least 6 months. The primary outcome was the number of re-interventions per patient-year. A propensity score matching (1:1) analysis was performed using age, Bismuth classification, reason for inoperability, pathological confirmation, systemic therapy and initial approach (endoscopic vs percutaneous).

Results: Patients in the metal stent group (n = 87) underwent fewer re-interventions compared with the plastic stent group (n = 40) (3.0 vs. 4.7 per patient-year; IRR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.88). When only non-elective re-interventions were included, there was no significant difference (2.1 vs. 2.7; IRR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.08). Results were similar in the propensity score-matched dataset.

Conclusions: This study shows that, also in patients with inoperable pCCA who survive at least 6 months, placement of metal stent(s) leads to fewer re-interventions in comparison with plastic stents.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Bile Duct Neoplasms* / pathology
  • Bile Duct Neoplasms* / surgery
  • Cholangiocarcinoma*
  • Humans
  • Klatskin Tumor* / surgery
  • Metals
  • Palliative Care / methods
  • Plastics
  • Propensity Score
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Stents
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Metals
  • Plastics