Fluid removal tolerance during the de-escalation phase: is preload unresponsiveness the best guiding candidate?
Crit Care
.
2023 Apr 20;27(1):154.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04444-3.
Authors
Martin Ruste
1
2
3
,
Rémi Schweizer
4
,
Jean-Luc Fellahi
4
5
6
,
Matthias Jacquet-Lagrèze
4
5
6
Affiliations
1
Service d'anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 59, Boulevard Pinel, 69677, Bron Cedex, France.
[email protected]
.
2
Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 8, Avenue Rockefeller, 69373, Lyon Cedex 08, France.
[email protected]
.
3
Laboratoire CarMeN, Inserm UMR 1060, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
[email protected]
.
4
Service d'anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 59, Boulevard Pinel, 69677, Bron Cedex, France.
5
Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 8, Avenue Rockefeller, 69373, Lyon Cedex 08, France.
6
Laboratoire CarMeN, Inserm UMR 1060, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
PMID:
37081541
PMCID:
PMC10116653
DOI:
10.1186/s13054-023-04444-3
No abstract available
Keywords:
Circulatory sufficiency; Fluid removal; Net ultrafiltration; Preload responsiveness.
Publication types
Letter
Comment
MeSH terms
Fluid Therapy
Hemodynamics
Humans
Shock, Septic*
Stroke Volume