A data-driven approach to optimizing clinical study eligibility criteria

J Biomed Inform. 2023 Jun:142:104375. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104375. Epub 2023 May 2.

Abstract

Objective: Feasible, safe, and inclusive eligibility criteria are crucial to successful clinical research recruitment. Existing expert-centered methods for eligibility criteria selection may not be representative of real-world populations. This paper presents a novel model called OPTEC (OPTimal Eligibility Criteria) based on the Multiple Attribute Decision Making method boosted by an efficient greedy algorithm.

Methods: It systematically identifies the optimal criteria combination for a given medical condition with the optimal tradeoff among feasibility, patient safety, and cohort diversity. The model offers flexibility in attribute configurations and generalizability to various clinical domains. The model was evaluated on two clinical domains (i.e., Alzheimer's disease and Neoplasm of pancreas) using two datasets (i.e., MIMIC-III dataset and NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center (NYP/CUIMC) database).

Results: We simulated the process of automatically optimizing eligibility criteria according to user-specified prioritization preferences and generated recommendations based on the top-ranked criteria combination accordingly (top 0.41-2.75%) with OPTEC. Harnessing the power of the model, we designed an interactive criteria recommendation system and conducted a case study with an experienced clinical researcher using the think-aloud protocol.

Conclusions: The results demonstrated that OPTEC could be used to recommend feasible eligibility criteria combinations, and to provide actionable recommendations for clinical study designers to construct a feasible, safe, and diverse cohort definition during early study design.

Keywords: Clinical study; Electronic health records; Optimization; Participant selection.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms*
  • Eligibility Determination
  • Humans
  • Patient Selection
  • Research Design*
  • Research Personnel