Tumor-neutrophil crosstalk promotes in vitro and in vivo glioblastoma progression

Front Immunol. 2023 May 24:14:1183465. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1183465. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Introduction: The tumor microenvironment (TME) of glioblastoma (GB) is characterized by an increased infiltration of immunosuppressive cells that attenuate the antitumor immune response. The participation of neutrophils in tumor progression is still controversial and a dual role in the TME has been proposed. In this study, we show that neutrophils are reprogrammed by the tumor to ultimately promote GB progression.

Methods: Using in vitro and in vivo assays, we demonstrate the existence of bidirectional GB and neutrophil communication, directly promoting an immunosuppressive TME.

Results and discussion: Neutrophils have shown to play an important role in tumor malignancy especially in advanced 3D tumor model and Balb/c nude mice experiments, implying a time- and neutrophil concentration-dependent modulation. Studying the tumor energetic metabolism indicated a mitochondria mismatch shaping the TME secretome. The given data suggests a cytokine milieu in patients with GB that favors the recruitment of neutrophils, sustaining an anti-inflammatory profile which is associated with poor prognosis. Besides, glioma-neutrophil crosstalk has sustained a tumor prolonged activation via NETs formation, indicating the role of NFκB signaling in tumor progression. Moreover, clinical samples have indicated that neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), IL-1β, and IL-10 are associated with poor outcomes in patients with GB.

Conclusion: These results are relevant for understanding how tumor progression occurs and how immune cells can help in this process.

Keywords: cancer; glioblastoma; neutrophil extracellular traps; tumor associated neutrophils; tumor microenvironment.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Glioblastoma*
  • Immunity
  • Mice
  • Mice, Nude
  • Neutrophils*
  • Signal Transduction
  • Tumor Microenvironment

Grants and funding

The authors would like to thank the Research Support Foundation of the state of Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS -19/2551-0000663-2; 21/2551-0000078-3; 22/2551-0000388-5; 22/2551-0000388-5), Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES; code 001), National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq - 312187/2018-1; 400882/2019-1; 400882/2019-1; 315522/2021-6), Research Incentive Fund of the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (FIPE 2019–0446; 2020-0708), Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre and Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre. DR, NO, MC, GG, NG, KG, JD, VT, PS, FT, GK, MW and EB were recipients of CNPq, CAPES, FAPERGS and UFCSPA fellowships. ABA and AP were supported by FIPE. PB, LS, ES and NC were also supported by FAPESP. NL was supported by the Walter Schulz Foundation. JS received support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC; RGPIN-2023-05498). DR, NO, MRA, MC, GG, NG, KG, JD, VT, PS, FT, GK, MW and EB were recipients of CNPq, CAPES, FAPERGS or UFCSPA fellowships.