Mucosal Violations and Their Effect on Successful Bladder Neck Closure in Cloacal Exstrophy

Background: Cloacal exstrophy (CE) is rare and challenging to reconstruct. In the majority of CE patients voided continence cannot be achieved and so patients often undergo bladder neck closure (BNC). Prior mucosal violations (MVs), a surgical event when the bladder mucosa was opened or closed, significantly predicted failed BNC in classic bladder exstrophy with an increased likelihood of failure after 3 or more MVs. The aim of this study was to assess predictors for failed BNC in CE.

Methods: CE patients who underwent BNC were reviewed for risk factors for failure including osteotomy use, successful primary closure, and number of MVs. Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests were used for comparing baseline characteristics and surgical details.

Results: Thirty-five patients underwent BNC. Eleven patients (31.4%) failed BNC including a vesicoperineal fistula in nine, vesicourethral and vesicocutaneous fistula in one each. The fistula rate in patients with 2 or more MVs was 47.4% (p = 0.0252). Two patients subsequently developed a vesicocutaneous fistula after undergoing repeated cystolithotomies. A rectus abdominis or gracilis muscle flap were used to close the fistula in 11 and 2 patients, respectively.

Conclusions: MVs have a greater impact in CE with an increased risk of failed BNC after 2 MVs. CE patients are most likely to develop a vesicoperineal fistula while a vesicocutaneous fistula is more likely after repeat cystolithotomy. A prophylactic muscle flap should be considered at time of BNC in patients with 2 or more MVs.

Levels of evidence: Prognosis Study, Level III.