Goal and aims: Our objective was to evaluate the performance of Belun Ring with second-generation deep learning algorithms in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) detection, OSA severity categorization, and sleep stage classification.
Focus technology: Belun Ring with second-generation deep learning algorithms REFERENCE TECHNOLOGY: In-lab polysomnography (PSG) SAMPLE: Eighty-four subjects (M: F = 1:1) referred for an overnight sleep study were eligible. Of these, 26% had PSG-AHI<5; 24% had PSG-AHI 5-15; 23% had PSG-AHI 15-30; 27% had PSG-AHI ≥ 30.
Design: Rigorous performance evaluation by comparing Belun Ring to concurrent in-lab PSG using the 4% rule.
Core analytics: Pearson's correlation coefficient, Student's paired t-test, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, Cohen's kappa coefficient (kappa), Bland-Altman plots with bias and limits of agreement, receiver operating characteristics curves with area under the curve, and confusion matrix.
Core outcomes: The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and kappa in categorizing AHI ≥ 5 were 0.85, 0.92, 0.64, and 0.58, respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and Kappa in categorizing AHI ≥ 15 were 0.89, 0.91, 0.88, and 0.79, respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and Kappa in categorizing AHI ≥ 30 were 0.91, 0.83, 0.93, and 0.76, respectively. BSP2 also achieved an accuracy of 0.88 in detecting wake, 0.82 in detecting NREM, and 0.90 in detecting REM sleep.
Core conclusion: Belun Ring with second-generation algorithms detected OSA with good accuracy and demonstrated a moderate-to-substantial agreement in categorizing OSA severity and classifying sleep stages.
Keywords: Apnea-hypopnea index; Artificial intelligence; Digital health; Home sleep apnea testing; Obstructive sleep apnea; Peripheral arterial tonometry; Photoplethysmography; Sleep technology; Validation.
Published by Elsevier Inc.