Quantification of odorous and potentially harmful substances in acrylic paint

Within this study sixteen odour active substances (1-butanol, butyl acetate, 3-methyl-4-heptanone, butyl acrylate, styrene, ethylbenzene, propylbenzene, cumene, sec-butylbenzene, benzaldehyde, 2-ethylhexyl acrylate, naphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, 1,2-dimethylnaphthalene, 1,7-dimethylnaphthalene), that have previously been identified in acryl paints were quantified in ten black acrylic paint samples using GC-GC-MS (heart-cut two-dimensional gas chromatography-mass spectrometry) after prior extraction and purification via solvent assisted flavour evaporation. In this case, the preceding analysis of the most abundant odour active volatiles via GC-O (gas chromatography-olfactometry) provided indications on which smell properties might be linked with elevated and concerning levels of possibly harmful substances. Based on that work, four samples raised attention due to their mainly repelling or unpleasant odour with mainly aromatic, solvent-like, mothball-like or geranium-like smell impressions. The remaining samples either showed fruity/fermented, fruity/apple juice-like, mushroom-like or cocoa-like/earthy odour qualities. The repelling and unpleasant odour was generally linked to naphthalene or benzene derivatives that are of concern with regard to being potential carcinogens. With concentrations ranging as high as from 3.75 mg/kg to 143.41 mg/kg, n-butanol was found to be the odour active substance with the highest concentrations in all but one paint sample. The results showed that all paints contain different and specific patterns of the analysed odour active substances and volatiles. Whereas only two samples revealed no elevated concentration of any of the quantified substances, two samples (A9 and A10) showed elevated levels for all or nearly all substances. The concentrations for single substances were generally lower than the recommended exposure limit and therefore unlikely to cause any adverse effects with regards to toxicity and irritation as single constituents. However, as a group of substances these might exert adverse health effects due to combined or synergistic effects. Based on these observations, the occurrence of combinations of potentially carcinogenic substances in products which are occupationally used on a daily basis or are in direct skin contact should thus be regarded with care in the future.