Placing patient-reported outcomes at the centre of cardiovascular clinical practice: implications for quality of care and management

Eur Heart J. 2023 Sep 21;44(36):3405-3422. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad514.

Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide important insights into patients' own perspectives about their health and medical condition, and there is evidence that their use can lead to improvements in the quality of care and to better-informed clinical decisions. Their application in cardiovascular populations has grown over the past decades. This statement describes what PROs are, and it provides an inventory of disease-specific and domain-specific PROs that have been developed for cardiovascular populations. International standards and quality indices have been published, which can guide the selection of PROs for clinical practice and in clinical trials and research; patients as well as experts in psychometrics should be involved in choosing which are most appropriate. Collaborations are needed to define criteria for using PROs to guide regulatory decisions, and the utility of PROs for comparing and monitoring the quality of care and for allocating resources should be evaluated. New sources for recording PROs include wearable digital health devices, medical registries, and electronic health record. Advice is given for the optimal use of PROs in shared clinical decision-making in cardiovascular medicine, and concerning future directions for their wider application.

Keywords: Health status; Measurement; Patient experiences; Patient-reported outcomes; Quality of life.

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures*
  • Quality of Life*