Efficacy and safety of a neurointerventional operation robotic assistance system in cerebral angiography

Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2024 Jun 21;9(3):243-251. doi: 10.1136/svn-2022-002260.

Abstract

Background: At present, neurointerventional surgery requires angiographers to perform operations in the digital subtraction angiography (DSA) room. Ionising radiation and chronic joint damage are still unavoidable for angiographers. Therefore, we researched and developed a neurointerventional robot-assisted system, which is operated by angiographers in an operating room outside the DSA room. We have conducted a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a robot-assisted system in human cerebral angiography. In the future, this research will provide a platform for the research and development of an intelligent surgical system and bring revolutionary progress in neurointerventional surgery.

Methods: From December 2020 to December 2021, 260 patients were enrolled from three medical centres, who were randomly and equally divided into a robot-assisted system group and a clinical routine cerebral angiography group. The success rate of angiography, the rate of the catheter reaching the target vessel, the operation time, X-ray radiation exposure and the incidence of related adverse events were compared between the two groups.

Results: A total of 257 patients completed this trial; baseline characteristics of the two groups did not differ significantly. The success rate of angiography in both the control group and the experimental group was 100%. The rate of the catheter reaching the target vessel was 99.23% and 100.00% in the control and experimental groups, respectively. For the control versus experimental groups, the angiographic operation time was 48.59±25.60 min versus 47.94±27.49 min, respectively; the X-ray radiation dose was 735.01±554.77 mGy versus 821.65±705.45 mGy, respectively; and the incidence of adverse events was 23.44% versus 22.48%, respectively. No statistical differences were present between the two groups.

Conclusion: The robot-assisted surgical system is more convenient for cerebral angiography and is as safe and effective as the traditional cerebral angiography.

Keywords: Angiography; Brain; Clinical Trial; Equipment and Supplies; Technology.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Angiography, Digital Subtraction* / adverse effects
  • Cerebral Angiography* / adverse effects
  • Cerebral Angiography* / methods
  • China
  • Endovascular Procedures / adverse effects
  • Endovascular Procedures / instrumentation
  • Equipment Design
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Operative Time
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prospective Studies
  • Radiation Dosage
  • Radiation Exposure* / adverse effects
  • Radiation Exposure* / prevention & control
  • Radiography, Interventional / adverse effects
  • Radiography, Interventional / instrumentation
  • Risk Factors
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures / adverse effects
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures / instrumentation
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome