Objective: This study aimed to examine the relationship between virtual technology system utilization and insurance status or type of visitation restrictions in a single-center neonatal intensive care unit.
Study design: Prospective cohort study with separate analyses performed based on insurance status (public vs. nonpublic) and "in effect" unit visitation restrictions. The three study epochs based on patient visitation restrictions were Epoch 1 (July to October 2019) with standard visitation restrictions, Epoch 2 (November 2019 to February 2020) with respiratory syncytial virus/influenza visitation restrictions, and Epoch 3 (March to June 2020) with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) visitation restrictions, respectively.
Results: Families of 357 infants used web-based cameras through most of the infant's hospitalization (median: 86.05%, Q3: 97.9%) with 165,795 total camera logins, indicating consistent utilization. There was a trend for fewer logins per infant and significantly longer time to consent (p = 0.03) in the Public Insurance group. Unit visitation restrictions impacted the time to consent, the shortest being in Epoch 3 during the COVID-19 pandemic (p = 0.03).
Conclusion: Virtual visitation technology is well embraced by neonatal instensive care unit families; however, gaps in access and use among subgroups signals a form of social inequality that needs to be explored further.
Key points: · Virtual visitation technology can bridge the distance gap for families of hospitalized infants.. · Utilization of virtual technology is affected by socioeconomic factors and seasonal unit visitation restrictions.. · Factors influencing disparities in access and utilization of virtual technology need to be investigated further..
Thieme. All rights reserved.