An investigational time course study of titanium plasma spray on osseointegration of PEEK and titanium implants: an in vivo ovine model

Spine J. 2024 Apr;24(4):721-729. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.10.005. Epub 2023 Oct 22.

Abstract

Background context: Methods to improve osseointegration of orthopedic spinal implants remains a clinical challenge. Materials composed of poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and titanium are commonly used in orthopedic applications due to their inherent properties of biocompatibility. Titanium has a clinical reputation for durability and osseous affinity, and PEEK offers advantages of a modulus that approximates osseous structures and is radiolucent. The hypothesis for the current investigation was that a titanium plasma spray (TPS) coating may increase the rate and magnitude of circumferential and appositional trabecular osseointegration of PEEK and titanium implants versus uncoated controls.

Purpose: Using an in vivo ovine model, the current investigation compared titanium plasma-sprayed PEEK and titanium dowels versus nonplasma-sprayed dowels. Using a time course study of 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively, experimental assays to quantify osseointegration included micro-computed tomography (microCT), biomechanical testing, and histomorphometry.

Study design/setting: In-vivo ovine model.

Methods: Twelve skeletally mature crossbred sheep were equally randomized into postoperative periods of 6 and 12 weeks. Four types of dowel implants-PEEK, titanium plasma-sprayed PEEK (TPS PEEK), titanium, and titanium plasma-sprayed titanium (TPS titanium) were implanted into cylindrical metaphyseal defects in the distal femurs and proximal humeri (one defect per limb, n=48 sites). Sixteen nonoperative specimens (eight femurs and eight humeri) served as zero time-point controls. Half of the specimens underwent destructive biomechanical pullout testing and the remaining half quantitative microCT to quantify circumferential bone volume within 1 mm and 2 mm of the implant surface and histomorphometry to compute direct trabecular apposition.

Results: There were no intra- or perioperative complications. The TPS-coated implants demonstrated significantly higher peak loads at dowel pullout at 6 and 12 weeks compared with uncoated controls (p<.05). No differences were observed across dowel treatments at the zero time-point (p>.05). MicroCT results exhibited no significant differences in circumferential osseointegration between implants within 1 mm or 2 mm of the dowel surface (p>.05). Direct appositional osseointegration of trabecular bone based on histomorphometry was higher for TPS-coated groups, regardless of base material, compared with uncoated treatments at both time intervals (p<.05).

Conclusions: The current in vivo study demonstrated the biological and mechanical advantages of plasma spray coatings. TPS improved histological incorporation and peak force required for implant extraction.

Clinical significance: Plasma spray coatings may offer clinical benefit by improving biological fixation and osseointegration within the first 6 to 12 weeks postoperatively- the critical healing period for implant-based arthrodesis procedures.

Keywords: Biomechanics; Implant materials; In vivo animal model; Osseointegration; Particulate wear debris; Titanium plasma spray.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Benzophenones*
  • Coated Materials, Biocompatible / chemistry
  • Ether
  • Ethers
  • Ethyl Ethers
  • Ketones* / chemistry
  • Osseointegration*
  • Polymers*
  • Sheep
  • Titanium / chemistry
  • X-Ray Microtomography

Substances

  • polyetheretherketone
  • Ketones
  • Titanium
  • Ether
  • Ethyl Ethers
  • Ethers
  • Coated Materials, Biocompatible
  • Benzophenones
  • Polymers