The Obesity Paradox in the Pediatric Trauma Patient

Background: Obesity is a chronic disease that adversely impacts patient outcomes and increasingly affecting the pediatric population. According to the CDC, in 2020 the prevalence of obesity among children and adolescents was estimated to be as high as 19.7%. The obesity paradox is the increased survival for overweight and obese adult trauma patients when compared to patients with healthy weights. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of BMI and outcomes in the pediatric trauma population.

Methods: Trauma patients in the 2-18 years age group and reported to the 2017-2019 National Trauma Data Bank were identified. CDC growth charts and z-scores were calculated to categorize patients into four subgroups: underweight (<5th percentile), healthy weight (5th-85th percentile), overweight (85th-95th percentile), and obesity (>95th percentile). Primary outcome studied was the mortality rate. Secondary outcomes included injury severity score (ISS), hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, and number of days on a ventilator. Continuous and categorical data were analyzed using ANOVA and Chi-squared test, respectively, using the healthy BMI category as reference group. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: A total of 161,458 patients [Underweight: 9148 (6%), Healthy weight: 88,009 (55%), Overweight: 26,740 (17%), and Obese: 37,561 (23%)] were included. The mean age was 11 years (SD:5.1). Total mortality for the patient set was 1825 (1.13%). The lowest mortality rate was in the obese group. The ISS was lowest in the obese group, while ICU LOS and days on ventilator were no different than control patients. Hospital LOS and transfer to rehabilitation rates were higher in the obese population.

Conclusion: Obesity appears to have a protective effect on mortality and significantly better secondary outcomes in the pediatric trauma population. Further study is necessary to evaluate the interplay between body weight and outcomes in pediatric trauma and disease states.

Level of evidence: III.