Pyroptosis and apoptosis are two forms of regulated cell death that can defend against intracellular infection. When a cell fails to complete pyroptosis, backup pathways will initiate apoptosis. Here, we investigated the utility of apoptosis compared to pyroptosis in defense against an intracellular bacterial infection. We previously engineered Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium to persistently express flagellin, and thereby activate NLRC4 during systemic infection in mice. The resulting pyroptosis clears this flagellin-engineered strain. We now show that infection of caspase-1 or gasdermin D deficient macrophages by this flagellin-engineered S. Typhimurium induces apoptosis in vitro. Additionally, we engineered S. Typhimurium to translocate the pro-apoptotic BH3 domain of BID, which also triggers apoptosis in macrophages in vitro. During mouse infection, the apoptotic pathway successfully cleared these engineered S. Typhimurium from the intestinal niche but failed to clear the bacteria from the myeloid niche in the spleen or lymph nodes. In contrast, the pyroptotic pathway was beneficial in defense of both niches. To clear an infection, cells may have specific tasks that they must complete before they die; different modes of cell death could initiate these 'bucket lists' in either convergent or divergent ways.
Keywords: Salmonella; apoptosis; extrusion; immunology; infectious disease; inflammation; microbiology; mouse; pyroptosis; regulated cell death.
Although alive and healthy cells are essential for survival, in certain circumstances – such as when a cell becomes infected – it is beneficial for cells to deliberately die through a process known as regulated cell death. There are several types of regulated cell death, each with distinct pathways and mechanisms. However, if the initial pathway is blocked, cells can use an alternative one, suggesting that they can compensate for one other. Two forms of regulated cell death – named pyroptosis and apoptosis – can be used by infected cells to limit the spread of pathogens. However, it was not clear if these two forms or additional ‘back-up’ apoptosis pathways – which are induced when pyroptosis fails – are equally efficient at clearing infections and how they might vary in different cell types. To address this, Abele et al. investigated cell death in live mice infected with the bacterium Salmonella. Different organs in which the bacterium infects distinct cell types were examined. Experiments showed that pyroptosis could eliminate bacteria from both intestinal cells as well as immune cells found throughout the body, called macrophages. In contrast, apoptosis was only able to clear infection from intestinal cells. The findings can be explained by prior studies showing both apoptosis and pyroptosis lead to the same outcome in intestinal cells – dead cells are expelled from the body through a process called extrusion to maintain the barrier function of the intestine. However, in macrophages, the different pathways lead to different outcomes, indicating they are not entirely interchangeable. Overall, the findings of Abele et al. underscore the complexity of cellular responses to infection and the nuanced roles of different cell death pathways. This provides further evidence that cells might have specific tasks they need to complete before death in order to effectively clear an infection. These tasks may differ depending on cell type and the form of regulated cell death, and may not be equally efficient at clearing an infection.
© 2023, Abele et al.