Safety and usability of an endo staple line reinforcement device for pulmonary resections

Background: Pulmonary resection can present technical challenges for surgeons due to the dissection and closure of tissues, which vary in thickness and elastic properties, occasionally leading to prolonged air leaks. Staple line reinforcements (SLRs) are widely utilized tools for fortifying the stability and integrity of closures in thoracic surgery, however, materials available and ease of use for both surgeon and scrub nurse have been suboptimal. A novel "click-and-go" device pre-loaded with bioabsorbable buttress material was recently developed, the Echelon Endopath SLR (ESLR, Ethicon, Inc., Cincinnati, OH, USA). This prospective study examines the safety and efficacy of this novel device in lung resections.

Methods: Adult surgical candidates undergoing primary pulmonary resection (both open and thoracoscopic) where the ESLR would be used were enrolled. Exclusion included reoperation/revision in same anatomical location, hypersensitivity to polyglactin or related products, and body mass index (BMI) ≥46.0 kg/m². The primary endpoint assessed the incidence of specific device-related adverse events (AEs): prolonged air leak and empyema. Additional endpoints included number of devices replaced during surgery due to slippage or bunching, and surgeon-reported usability responses. Data was summarized for AEs deemed device-related and usability questionnaire responses.

Results: A total of 131 subjects were included in the primary endpoint analysis data set with 120 subjects completing the study (91.6%). The mean age at consent was 62.8±12.0 years and 55.7% were female. The most common primary indication for the procedure was malignancy 61.1%, and primary non-malignant lung disease (non-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) 12.2%. Common procedures performed were wedge resection (58.0%) and lobectomy (34.4%). There were zero reported device-specific/-related AEs which counted toward the primary endpoint. Responses from a usability questionnaire found all surgeons (100.0%) reported the ease of setup was superior to previous devices utilized. Surgeons expressed greater confidence in the buttress material of the ESLR than that of previous SLR devices (strongly agree 88.9%; slightly agree 11.1%). Most also felt that there was less wastage with the click-and-go ESLR (strongly agree 77.8%, slightly agree 11.1%, neutral 11.1%).

Conclusions: The ESLR device demonstrates safe and effective performance in this post-market study of specific thoracic procedures. Furthermore, surgeons found this was easier to use.