Sidebands in CEST MR-How to recognize and avoid them

Magn Reson Med. 2024 Jun;91(6):2391-2402. doi: 10.1002/mrm.30011. Epub 2024 Feb 5.

Abstract

Purpose: Clinical scanners require pulsed CEST sequences to maintain amplifier and specific absorption rate limits. During off-resonant RF irradiation and interpulse delay, the magnetization can accumulate specific relative phases within the pulse train. In this work, we show that these phases are important to consider, as they can lead to unexpected artifacts when no interpulse gradient spoiling is performed during the saturation train.

Methods: We investigated sideband artifacts using a CEST-3D snapshot gradient-echo sequence at 3 T. Initially, Bloch-McConnell simulations were carried out with Pulseq-CEST, while measurements were performed in vitro and in vivo.

Results: Sidebands can be hidden in Z-spectra, and their structure becomes clearly visible only at high sampling. Sidebands are further influenced by B0 inhomogeneities and the RF phase cycling within the pulse train. In vivo, sidebands are mostly visible in liquid compartments such as CSF. Multi-pulse sidebands can be suppressed by interpulse gradient spoiling.

Conclusion: We provide new insights into sidebands occurring in pulsed CEST experiments and show that, similar as in imaging sequences, gradient and RF spoiling play an important role. Gradient spoiling avoids misinterpretations of sidebands as CEST effects especially in liquid environments including pathological tissue or for CEST resonances close to water. It is recommended to simulate pulsed CEST sequences in advance to avoid artifacts.

Keywords: CEST; artifacts; gradient spoiling; phase‐cycling; pulsed CEST imaging; pulseq‐CEST; sidebands.

MeSH terms

  • Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
  • Image Enhancement* / methods
  • Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / methods
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging* / methods
  • Phantoms, Imaging