Coronary Vasomotor Dysfunction Is Associated With Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Feb 26;17(4):474-487. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.11.039.

Abstract

Background: Coronary vasomotor dysfunction (CVDys) can be comprehensively classified on the basis of anatomy and functional mechanisms.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between different CVDys phenotypes and outcomes in patients with angina and nonobstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA).

Methods: Patients with ANOCA who underwent coronary reactivity testing using an intracoronary Doppler guidewire to assess microvascular and epicardial coronary endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent function were enrolled. Endothelium-dependent microvascular and epicardial coronary dysfunction were defined as a <50% change in coronary blood flow in response to intracoronary acetylcholine (Ach) infusion and a <-20% change in coronary artery diameter in response to Ach. Endothelium-independent microvascular and epicardial coronary dysfunction were defined as coronary flow reserve < 2.5 during adenosine-induced hyperemia and change in cross-sectional area in response to intracoronary nitroglycerin administration < 20%. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, heart failure, stroke, and late revascularization) served as clinical outcomes.

Results: Among the 1,196 patients with ANOCA, the prevalence of CVDys was 24.5% and 51.8% among those with endothelium-independent and endothelium-dependent microvascular dysfunction, respectively, and 47.4% and 25.4% among those with endothelium-independent and endothelium-dependent epicardial coronary dysfunction, respectively. During 6.3 years (Q1-Q3: 2.5-12.9 years) of follow-up, patients with endothelium-dependent microvascular dysfunction, endothelium-dependent epicardial coronary dysfunction, or endothelium-independent microvascular dysfunction showed significantly higher event rates compared with those without (19.5% vs 12.0% [P < 0.001], 19.7% vs 14.6% [P = 0.038] and 22.2% vs 13.8% [P = 0.001], respectively). Coronary flow reserve (HR: 0.757; 95% CI: 0.604-0.957) and percentage change in coronary blood flow in response to Ach infusion (HR: 0.998; 95% CI: 0.996-0.999) remained significant predictors of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event after adjustment for conventional risk factors.

Conclusions: CVDys phenotype is differentially associated with worse outcomes, and endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent microvascular function provide independent prognostic information in patients with ANOCA.

Keywords: coronary vasomotor dysfunction; endothelium-dependent dysfunction; endothelium-independent dysfunction; microvascular dysfunction; nonobstructive coronary artery disease.

MeSH terms

  • Acetylcholine
  • Angina Pectoris
  • Coronary Angiography
  • Coronary Artery Disease*
  • Coronary Circulation
  • Coronary Vessels / diagnostic imaging
  • Endothelium, Vascular
  • Humans
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Acetylcholine