Rationale & objective: We sought to compare outcomes of patients receiving dialysis after cardiothoracic surgery on the basis of dialysis modality (intermittent hemodialysis [HD] vs peritoneal dialysis [PD]).
Study design: This was a retrospective analysis.
Setting & participants: In total, 590 patients with kidney failure receiving intermittent HD or PD undergoing coronary artery bypass graft and/or valvular cardiac surgery at Cleveland Clinic were included.
Exposure: The patients received PD versus HD (intermittent or continuous).
Outcomes: Our primary outcomes were in-hospital and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, days in the intensive care unit, the number of intraoperative blood transfusions, postsurgical pericardial effusion, and sternal wound infection, and a composite of the following 4 in-hospital events: death, cardiac arrest, effusion, and sternal wound infection.
Analytical approach: We used χ2, Fisher exact, Wilcoxon rank sum, and t tests, Kaplan-Meier survival, and plots for analysis.
Results: Among the 590 patients undergoing cardiac surgery, 62 (11%) were receiving PD, and 528 (89%) were receiving intermittent HD. Notably, 30-day Kaplan-Meier survival was 95.7% (95% CI: 93.9-97.5) for HD and 98.2% (95% CI: 94.7-100) for PD (P = 0.30). In total, 75 patients receiving HD (14.2%) and 1 patient receiving PD (1.6%) had a composite of 4 in-hospital events (death, cardiac arrest, effusion, and sternal wound infection) (P = 0.005). Out of 62 patients receiving PD, 16 (26%) were converted to HD.
Limitations: Retrospective analyses are prone to residual confounding. We lacked details about nutritional data. Intensive care unit length of stay was used as a surrogate for volume status control. Patients have been followed in a single health care system. The HD cohort outnumbered the PD cohort significantly.
Conclusions: When compared with PD, HD does not appear to improve outcomes of patients with kidney failure undergoing cardiothoracic surgery. Patients receiving PD had a lower incidence of a composite outcome of 4 in-hospital events (death, cardiac arrest, pericardial effusion, and sternal wound infections).
Keywords: End-stage kidney disease; cardiac surgery; hemodialysis; kidney failure; peritoneal dialysis.
Patients receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD) are frequently switched to hemodialysis (HD) around the time of an open-heart surgery. More times than not, this is driven by the preference of nonkidney doctors, because HD is perceived to control toxins and fluids better. PD is, however, more advantageous and can achieve similar results while being gentler. In an effort to keep patients on their home PD, we analyzed how they fared when compared with their HD counterparts. Patients maintained on PD did just as well if not better around and after their open-heart surgery. Given the expected increase in patients treated with PD, efforts should be made to maintain them on their home modality even around major surgeries.
© 2023 The Authors.