Efficacy of the traction method for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial (with videos)

Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Aug;100(2):307-311.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.03.018. Epub 2024 Mar 18.

Abstract

Background and aims: To overcome the technical difficulties associated with gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), a novel traction device that can alter the direction of traction was developed. This study compared the efficacy and safety of conventional ESD versus those of traction-assisted gastric ESD.

Methods: Patients with a single gastric epithelial neoplasm were randomized to receive conventional (n = 75) or traction-assisted (n = 73) gastric ESD. The primary outcome was ESD procedure time.

Results: There were no differences between the conventional and traction-assisted groups with respect to treatment results or adverse events. The mean procedure time was similar for both groups (78.9 vs 88.3 minutes, respectively; P = .3); however, times for the traction device tended to be shorter for lesions in the lesser curvature of the upper or middle stomach (84.6 vs 123.2 minutes; P = .057).

Conclusions: Traction-assisted ESD for lesions in the lesser curvature of the upper or middle stomach were shorter, thereby reducing the procedure time of conventional ESD. (Clinical trial registration: University Hospital Medial Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, identifier 000044450.).

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Video-Audio Media

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Endoscopic Mucosal Resection* / methods
  • Female
  • Gastric Mucosa / surgery
  • Gastroscopy* / methods
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Operative Time*
  • Stomach Neoplasms* / pathology
  • Stomach Neoplasms* / surgery
  • Traction* / methods
  • Treatment Outcome