Maximum burn prevention practice vs conventional care after direct current cardioversion treatment: The BURN-PREVENTION trial

Reina Tonegawa-Kuji; Kenichiro Yamagata; Koshiro Kanaoka; Akinori Wakamiya; Yuko Y Inoue; Koji Miyamoto; Yoshihiro Miyamoto; Eiji Kiyohara; Kengo Kusano

doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.03.1818

Maximum burn prevention practice vs conventional care after direct current cardioversion treatment: The BURN-PREVENTION trial

Heart Rhythm. 2024 Oct;21(10):2060-2062. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.03.1818. Epub 2024 Apr 8.

Authors

Reina Tonegawa-Kuji¹, Kenichiro Yamagata², Koshiro Kanaoka³, Akinori Wakamiya⁴, Yuko Y Inoue⁴, Koji Miyamoto⁴, Yoshihiro Miyamoto³, Eiji Kiyohara⁵, Kengo Kusano⁶

Affiliations

¹ Department of Medical and Health Information Management, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan; Genomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.
² Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan. Electronic address: [email protected].
³ Department of Medical and Health Information Management, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.
⁴ Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.
⁵ Department of Dermatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
⁶ Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan. Electronic address: [email protected].

PMID: 38599471
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.03.1818

No abstract available

Keywords: Atrial arrhythmia; Atrial fibrillation; Burn prevention; Cardioversion; Clobetasol ointment; Local cold application; Randomized controlled trial.

Publication types

Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

Atrial Fibrillation* / therapy
Electric Countershock* / adverse effects
Electric Countershock* / methods
Female
Humans
Male
Treatment Outcome