Risk Prediction of Post-Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Coagulation Syndrome

Dig Dis. 2024;42(4):309-318. doi: 10.1159/000539007. Epub 2024 Apr 22.

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been popular worldwide to treat laterally spreading tumors and large polyps. Post-ESD coagulation syndrome (PECS) is more common than the two major ESD-related complications, perforation, and bleeding. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of PECS, identify the risk factors for PECS, and create a risk prediction model for PECS.

Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed a total of 986 patients who underwent colorectal ESD. Logistic regression models were used to assess risk factors with PECS. Each risk factor was scored, and the 3-step risk stratification index of prediction model was assessed.

Results: The prevalence of PECS was 21.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 18.9-24.1%). The risk factors of PECS in the multivariate logistic regression were tumor size (+1 cm: odds ratio [OR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.16-7.09), cecal lesion (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.09-1.53), procedure time (+30 min: OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.02-1.39), and ESD with snaring (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.95). Applying a simplified weighted scoring system based on adjusted OR increments of 1, the risk of PECS was 12.3% (95% CI, 0.3-16.0%) for the low-risk group (score ≤4) and was 36.0% (95% CI = 29.4-43.2%) for the high-risk group (score ≥8). Overall discrimination (C-statistic = 0.629; 95% CI = 0.585-0.672) and calibration (p = 0.993) of the model were moderate to good.

Conclusion: PECS occurs frequently, and the prediction model can be helpful for effective treatment and prevention of PECS.

Keywords: Colorectal tumor; Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Post-endoscopic submucosal dissection coagulation syndrome.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / pathology
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / surgery
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Endoscopic Mucosal Resection* / adverse effects
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Logistic Models
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Postoperative Complications* / epidemiology
  • Postoperative Complications* / etiology
  • Prevalence
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Syndrome

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea grant funded by the Korea government (NRF-2022R1A2B5B02002092) and by the Future Medicine 2030 Project of the Samsung Medical Center (SMO1220041).