Endoscopic endonasal pituitary sacrifice for select tumors with retrochiasmatic and/or retrosellar extension: surgical anatomy, operative technique, and case series

Objective: Tumors located in the retrochiasmatic region with extension to the third ventricle might be difficult to access when the pituitary-chiasmatic corridor is narrow. Similarly, tumor extension into the interpeduncular and retrosellar space poses a major surgical challenge. Pituitary transposition techniques have been developed to gain additional access. However, when preoperative pituitary function is already impaired or the risk of postoperative panhypopituitarism (PH) is considered to be particularly high, removal of the pituitary gland (PG) might be the preferred option to increase the working corridor. The aim of this study was to describe the relevant surgical anatomy, operative steps, and clinical experience with the endoscopic endonasal pituitary sacrifice (EEPS) and transsellar approach.

Methods: This study comprised anatomical dissections to highlight the relevant surgical steps and a retrospective case series reporting clinical characteristics, indications, and outcomes of patients who underwent EEPS. The surgical technique is as follows: both lateral opticocarotid recesses are exposed laterally, the limbus sphenoidale superiorly, and the sellar floor inferiorly. After opening the dura, the PG is detached circumferentially and mobilized off the medial walls of the cavernous sinuses. The descending branches of the superior hypophyseal artery are coagulated, and the stalk is transected. After removal of the PG, drilling of the dorsum sellae and bilateral posterior clinoidectomies are performed to gain access to the hypothalamic region, interpeduncular, and prepontine cisterns.

Results: From 2018 to 2023, 11 patients underwent EEPS. The cohort comprised mostly tuberoinfundibular craniopharyngiomas (n = 8, 73%). Seven (64%) patients had partial or complete anterior PG dysfunction preoperatively, while 4 (36%) had preoperative diabetes insipidus. Because of the specific tumor configuration, the chance of preserving endocrine function was estimated to be very low in patients with intact function. The main reasons for pituitary sacrifice were impaired visibility and surgical accessibility to the retrochiasmatic and retrosellar spaces. Gross-total tumor resection was achieved in 10 (91%) patients and near-total resection in 1 (9%) patient. Two (18%) patients experienced a postoperative CSF leak, requiring surgical revision.

Conclusions: When preoperative pituitary function is already impaired or the risk for postoperative PH is considered particularly high, the EEPS and transsellar approach appears to be a feasible surgical option to improve visibility and accessibility to the retrochiasmatic hypothalamic and retrosellar spaces, thus increasing tumor resectability.