Supramarginal resection of skull base chordomas: proof of concept and preliminary outcomes

Objective: The mainstay of treatment for skull base chordoma (SBC) is maximal safe resection followed by radiotherapy. However, even after gross-total resection (GTR), the recurrence rate is high due to microscopic disease in the resection margins. Therefore, supramarginal resection (SMR) could be beneficial, as has been shown for sacral chordoma. The paradigm of postoperative radiation therapy for every patient has also begun to change, as molecular profiling has shown variability in the risk of recurrence. The aim of this study was to present the concept of SMR applied to SBC, along with an individualized decision for postoperative radiation therapy.

Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of all SBCs operated on by the senior author between 2018 and 2023. SMR was defined as negative histological margins of bone and/or dura mater, along with evidence of bone resection beyond the tumor margins in the craniocaudal and lateral planes on postoperative imaging. Tumors were classified into 3 molecular recurrence risk groups (group A, low risk; group B, intermediate risk; and group C, high risk). Postoperative radiation therapy was indicated in group C tumors, in group B chordomas without SMR, or in cases of patient preference.

Results: Twenty-two cases of SBC fulfilled the inclusion criteria. SMR was achieved in 12 (55%) cases, with a mean (range) amount of bone resection beyond the tumor margins of 10 (2-20) mm (+40%) in the craniocaudal axis and 6 (1-15) mm (+31%) in the lateral plane. GTR and near-total resection were each achieved in 5 (23%) cases. Three (19%) tumors were classified as group A, 12 (75%) as group B, and 1 (6%) as group C. Although nonsignificant due to the small sample size, the trends showed that patients in the SMR group had smaller tumor volumes (13.9 vs 19.6 cm3, p = 0.35), fewer previous treatments (33% vs 60% of patients, p = 0.39), and less use of postoperative radiotherapy (25% vs 60%, p = 0.19) compared to patients in the non-SMR group. There were no significant differences in postoperative CSF leak (0% vs 10%, p = 0.45), persistent cranial nerve palsy (8% vs 20%, p = 0.57), and tumor recurrence (8% vs 10%, p = 0.99; mean follow-up 15 months) rates between the SMR and non-SMR groups.

Conclusions: In select cases, SMR of SBC appears to be feasible and safe. Larger cohorts and longer follow-up evaluations are necessary to explore the benefit of SMR and individualized postoperative radiation therapy on progression-free survival.