Deciphering the role of alternative splicing in neoplastic diseases for immune-oncological therapies

Front Immunol. 2024 Apr 26:15:1386993. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1386993. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Alternative splicing (AS) is an important molecular biological mechanism regulated by complex mechanisms involving a plethora of cis and trans-acting elements. Furthermore, AS is tissue specific and altered in various pathologies, including infectious, inflammatory, and neoplastic diseases. Recently developed immuno-oncological therapies include monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting, among others, immune checkpoint (ICP) molecules. Despite therapeutic successes have been demonstrated, only a limited number of patients showed long-term benefit from these therapies with tumor entity-related differential response rates were observed. Interestingly, splice variants of common immunotherapeutic targets generated by AS are able to completely escape and/or reduce the efficacy of mAb- and/or CAR-based tumor immunotherapies. Therefore, the analyses of splicing patterns of targeted molecules in tumor specimens prior to therapy might help correct stratification, thereby increasing therapy success by antibody panel selection and antibody dosages. In addition, the expression of certain splicing factors has been linked with the patients' outcome, thereby highlighting their putative prognostic potential. Outstanding questions are addressed to translate the findings into clinical application. This review article provides an overview of the role of AS in (tumor) diseases, its molecular mechanisms, clinical relevance, and therapy response.

Keywords: CTLA-4; HLA-G; PD-1; PD-L1; alternative splicing; antibody therapy; immune checkpoints.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Alternative Splicing*
  • Animals
  • Humans
  • Immunotherapy / methods
  • Immunotherapy, Adoptive / methods
  • Neoplasms* / genetics
  • Neoplasms* / immunology
  • Neoplasms* / therapy

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The project was funded by Monika Kutzner Foundation (SJ-B), German Research Foundation (DFG, JA 3192/1-1, 496182670, SJ-B) as well as Cancer Aid 70113450 (BS), DFG SE 581/33-1 (BS), GIF-I-1412-41413 (BS), and BMBF EPI-Lymph 161B0800B (BS, CW).