Perceived usefulness of percutaneous coronary intervention feedback mechanisms

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2024 May 20:S1553-8389(24)00495-0. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.05.026. Online ahead of print.

¹ VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, United States of America; University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Cardiac Care Outcomes Assessment Program, Seattle, WA, United States of America. Electronic address: [email protected].
² VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, United States of America; University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Cardiac Care Outcomes Assessment Program, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
³ University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
⁴ University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States of America; CART Program, Office of Quality and Patient Safety, Veterans Health Administration, Washington DC, United States of America; Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
⁵ Cardiac Care Outcomes Assessment Program, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Pulse Heart Institute, Tacoma, WA, United States of America.

No abstract available

Keywords: Feedback; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Professional development; Quality improvement.