Restricted cusp motion in newly implanted tricuspid bioprostheses: Incidence, predictors, and impact on survival

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 May 31:S0022-5223(24)00452-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.05.021. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the occurrence of restricted cusp motion (RCM) at the time of bioprosthetic tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) and analyze associated risk factors and outcomes.

Methods: This study involved adult patients who underwent TVR with a bioprosthesis at our institution between 2012 and 2022. Bioprosthetic cusp motion was analyzed de novo through a detailed review of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiograms (TEE). Two models of porcine valves were implanted: the Medtronic Hancock II bioprosthesis and the St Jude Medical Epic bioprosthesis.

Results: Among the 476 patients who met the inclusion criteria, RCM was identified on immediate post-bypass TEE in 150 (31.5%); there was complete immobility of the cusp in 63 patients (13.2%) and limited movement of a cusp in 87 patients (18.3%). In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, the Hancock II model (odds ratio [OR], 6.15; P < .001), a larger orifice area (per IQR increase: OR, 1.58; P = .017), a smaller body surface area (per IQR increase: OR, .68; P = .040), and a lower ejection fraction (per IQR increase: OR, .60; P = .033) were independently associated with having RCM. Cox regression adjusting for 15 covariates revealed that RCM at the time of TVR was independently associated with an increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio, 1.35; P = .049).

Conclusions: This study revealed a high incidence of RCM in bioprosthetic valves in the tricuspid position detected shortly postimplantation, which was associated with increased late mortality. To reduce the probability of RCM, it is important to select the appropriate prosthesis model and size, particularly in small patients.

Keywords: bioprosthesis; restricted cusp motion; tricuspid valve; valve prosthetic dysfunction.