The causal role of gut microbiota in susceptibility of Long COVID: a Mendelian randomization study

Front Microbiol. 2024 May 30:15:1404673. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1404673. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Background: Long COVID is a major challenge facing the public. Gut microbiota is closely related to Long COVID. However, the causal effects between gut microbiota and Long COVID remains unclear.

Methods: Using summary statistics from Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS), Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses were performed to investigate the relationship between gut microbiota and Long COVID. The primary statistical method employed was Inverse Variance Weighted (IVW). Sensitivity analyses were then conducted to evaluate the reliability of the findings and account for potential confounding variables. Finally, a reverse MR analysis was conducted to examine potential associations between Long COVID and genetically predicted gut microbiota compositions.

Results: There were 2 positive and 1 negative causal effect between gut microbiota and Long COVID. Meta-analysis results show that genus Parasutterella (OR = 1.145, 95%CI = 1.035 ∼ 1.266, P = 0.008) and genus Oscillospira (OR = 1.425, 95%CI = 1.235 ∼ 1.645, P < 0.001) significantly increased the risk of Long COVID. And genus Eisenbergiella (OR = 0.861, 95%CI = 0.785 ∼ 0.943, P = 0.001) significantly decreased the risk of Long COVID. Neither the pleiotropy nor the heterogeneity was observed. Reverse causal effect does not hold.

Conclusion: Our research has provided genetic evidence that establishes multiple causal relationships between the gut microbiota and Long COVID, supporting the role of the gut microbiota in Long COVID. It is possible that different taxa play a role in the development of Long COVID. The causal relationships identified in this study require further investigation.

Keywords: Long COVID; Mendelian randomization; causality; genome-wide association study; gut microbiota.

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82374392), the National Key Research and Development Plan of China (2022YFC0867400), the National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine project (2023ZYLCYJ02-21), the Key Technologies Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (2023B1111020003), the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (No.2023B1212060062), Basic and Applied Basic Research of Guangzhou City-University Joint Funding Project (202201020382), Open project of Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research on Emergency in TCM (KF2023JZ06), Research Fund for Zhaoyang Talents of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine (ZY2022KY10 and ZY2022YL04), and Clinical Research Project of Chinese Society of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2023 DEPLHGG-06).